Phantom Maelstrom Blog is no longer active. The new address is at http://al2meta.astralmeta.com

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

4 Theories of last weeks Facebook's 'porn and gore' epidemic

This is just a recap of last week's news regarding Facebook porn attack. Facebook users had been facing awkward moments as graphic images of sexual and violent posts turn up in their feeds, but who's behind this attack? How did this "porn and gore" problem" manage to manifest on a site supposedly well protected?

It was reported that Facebook users who innocently clicked a tempting link inadvertently flooded their feeds with extremely graphic images of sex acts, mutilated animals and people, and even "Jesus porn," which were automatically posted for all their friends to see. Angry users took to Twitter to vent their disgust with "unstoppable torrents of hardcore pornography and gory, violent pictures," and threaten to decamp to Google+. Facebook acknowledged the issue, blaming it on a "coordinated spam attack," and said it was fixing the problem. But who's to blame for Facebook's flood of photos of dead dogs, Justin Bieber photoshopped into compromising positions, and naked octogenarians?

The week's editorial staff has 4 theories:

Theory 1: Blame Anonymous

What is anonymous? Who are they? Actually, there is little information about this group, but they are a group of hackers that practice online activism, they are what we call "hacktivist." Previously, they have threatened to destroy Facebook on November 5, however, this attack did not took place, as it was said that there was no signal from their leader, and that this attack hasn't been decided by all of its members, but by only a fraction of them. Their reason was "Facebook has been selling 'sensitive' user information to government agencies and giving secret access to security firms so that they can spy on Facebook users — as all data is stored on Facebook's servers and can be accessed at anytime." According to Kevin Parrish in Tom's Guide, Anonymous did threaten to attack Facebook using a powerful "Guy Fawkes virus" they developed. That virus purportedly takes control of your Facebook account and then infects your friends' accounts.


Anonymous threatens to destroy Facebook.


Anonymous announces operation to release Guy Fawkes virus on Facebook.


Anonymous had posted videos, "blatantly admitting to the Facebook attack." I buy it, says Adrian Chen in Gawker. "Spamming gore and porn is definitely one of Anonymous' trademark moves."

Theory 2: No other hackers are behind this

"I find it hard to believe that Anonymous would stoop to this," says Chris Matyszczyk in CNET News. And "indeed, Facebook told CNET it knows who is responsible" for this malicious, massive spam attack, and is readying legal action. Even if Anonymous is not officially behind this, says Emil Protalinski in ZDNet, it only takes a few "ex-members to pull something like this off."

Theory 3: Blame Facebook itself

The flood of violent and pornographic photos and video links is actually "the type of spam we've seen on Facebook before," says Protalinski, only now it's "coming in at a much faster pace." Even the link bait is the same — "Kim Kardashian, etc.," says Violet Blue in ZDNet. So what's changed? "Facebook's recent timeline upgrades" make that spam easier to propagate. And while grannies and impressionable teens are the ones being exposed to this thrash, the attack is "a bizarrely clever slap at the one thing Facebook is such an extreme hypocrite about": Adult content.

Additionally, note that Facebook Developers module can also serve as an entry point for such attacks. It has happened before, only that this is the big one.

Theory 4: Blame the gullible users

Hackers couldn't have done this without the help of easily fooled Facebook users. "My own Facebook news feed is image-spam free," says Kashmir Hill in Forbes. Why? My Facebook friends and I apparently aren't "unwise enough" to fall for the bait. Unless you click on links in messages like "OMG, I can't believe Kim did this" or "Wow, I can't believe you did this in this video. I LOLed," you and your friends won't "end up with naked grandmas and photoshopped teen idols in your feed."

This is true as most Facebook users who aren't familiar with spam usually bite the bait. Most especially if the bait is intriguing, eye-catching, or popular. The worst part on this is that once one of them caught the bait, it is shared on the news feed, and when friends see it, they also join in. Sometimes, they simply comment, which is still unwise, because by commenting, although they didn't fall in the trap, they could still risk their friends who would be able to see the link with the comment.

Related Topics

Facebook Porn Attack

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Powerade Coupons